Boosta Pro vs Opus Clip vs Vizard: Which Video Clipping Tool Should You Choose in 2026?

Hey! 👋

If you create video content, you know the problem: one hour of recording takes 2-4 hours of manual editing to produce 10-20 clips for TikTok, YouTube Shorts, and Instagram.

I tested 4 major automatic clipping tools and want to share what I found. Useful for beginners and serious creators alike.

What's on the market?

The main players:

Yes, that's not a mistake. Boosta really does give 10x more processing for the same or lower price.

Cost per 100 minutes of video

This is the easiest metric to compare:

Boosta is 14x cheaper than Opus.

This isn't marketing and it's not a calculation error. This is the actual market reality in 2026.

Real-world scenarios

Scenario 1: You process 100 hours of video per year

Conclusion: Boosta is cheaper AND gives more.

Scenario 2: You're a serious creator (500 hours per year)

That's roughly 10 hours of video per week. Normal for podcasters, streamers, and video bloggers.

For 500 hours/year:

• Boosta: $240/year

• Opus: ~$1,044/year (4.3x more expensive)

• Vizard: ~$420/year (1.75x more expensive)

• 2short: ~$480/year (2x more expensive)

What else matters?

Boosta Pro

Pros:

• Desktop app (works without internet)

• Local processing (your videos don't go to the cloud)

• 8 recognition modes (podcasts, streams, interviews, educational, films, livestreams, faceless content, music)

• Visual configs (subtitles, logos, colors)—everything in one place

• 50% affiliate commission (if you recommend to friends)

  

Cons:

• Desktop only (no mobile editing)

• Limited team collaboration

Opus Clip Pro

Pros:

• Most popular, large community

• Good team collaboration tools

• Fast cloud processing

Cons:

• Expensive ($348/year minimum)

• Small volumes (300 minutes/month)

• One generic algorithm for all video types

Vizard Creator

Pros:

• Cheaper than Opus ($174/year)

• Good team collaboration tools

• Batch processing (30 videos at once)

  

Cons:

• Still not enough minutes for serious creators

• Generic algorithm

2short.ai

Pros:

• Free plan to try (30 minutes/month)

• Simple interface

• Good facial tracking

Cons:

• Small volumes

• No affiliate program

• No team collaboration

Affiliate program (unexpected factor)

If you have an audience, this matters:

If you have 10,000 followers and even 0.2% convert (20 people/month):

With Boosta you don't just save money—you earn $2,400/year from recommendations.

Who should choose what?

Choose Boosta if:

• You process any volume of video

• Budget matters

• You work with sensitive content (need privacy)

• You have an audience to recommend to

• You want local processing (no cloud)

Choose Opus if:

• You have a budget

• You work in a team

• You need advanced tools

• Community and ecosystem matter

Choose Vizard if:

• You want balance between price and features

• You need team collaboration but cheaper than Opus

• Batch processing 30 videos at once matters

Choose 2short if:

• You're trying video clipping for the first time

• You want a free plan (30 minutes/month)

• You process less than 5 hours per month

Final verdict

For most creators in 2026, Boosta looks like the obvious choice.

Not because it's the most advanced (it's not), but because:

1. Price is unbeatable—$0.07 per 100 minutes vs. $0.97 for Opus

2. Volumes—even a serious creator (500 hours/year) is completely covered for $20/month

3. Privacy—desktop app, local processing, your videos don't live on someone else's servers

4. Affiliate—if you recommend the tool, Boosta pays 50%, which is 7x more than Opus

Not perfect for teams (Opus is better), not perfect if you work everywhere (Opus and Vizard are better).

But for an individual creator, especially if price and volume matter—this is the best option on the market right now.

How to get started?

If you decide to try:

1. Download from boosta.pro

2. Install on Windows or Mac

3. Pay $20/month

4. Get 3,000 minutes of processing

No clouds, no payment surprises. Simple.

What tool do you use? Drop a comment—curious to hear other creators' experiences.

Thanks for reading!